ArticleScientific reports2025
Repeated laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy techniques and pitfalls to watch out with video.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Third-Redo Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Hepaticojejunostomy for Recurrent Anastomotic Stones: A Video-Based Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Redo laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for recurrent benign biliary strictures after failed primary anastomosis: technical nuances and mid-term outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is a crucial procedure for treating biliary diseases, especially in patients with recurrent hepatolithiasis. However, the safety and efficacy of repeat laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy(R-LRHJS) remain controversial due to the complexity of hepatobiliary stones and the potential for complications. A total of 41 patients admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from June 2019 to December 2023 were reviewed. 20 patients who underwent repeat R-LRHJS were included in the final analysis. Surgical techniques emphasized meticulous dissection of intra-abdominal adhesions, precise identification of the hepatic hilum bile duct, and careful reconstruction of the biliary-enteric anastomosis. The mean patient age was 54.6 ± 10.7 years. Operative time ranged from 120 to 378 min, with intraoperative blood loss between 10 and 200 ml. Postoperative complications included anastomotic bleeding (2 cases), pancreatic stump bleeding (1 case), duodenal fistula (1 case), and biliary leakage (5 cases). No perioperative deaths occurred. During a 1- to 3-year follow-up, no recurrence of anastomotic stenosis or stone formation was observed on MRCP. The study concludes that R-LRHJS is a feasible and effective treatment for recurrent biliary strictures or stones following initial choledochojejunostomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.