Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890292›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of segmentation performance of cnns, vision transformers, and hybrid networks for paranasal sinuses with sinusitis on CT images.

Dahyun Song, Su Yang, Ji Yong Han, Kwang Gi Kim, Seon Tae Kim, Won-Jin Yi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dahyun SongInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Su YangDepartment of Applied Bioengineering, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Ji Yong HanInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of IT Convergence, Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.
Seon Tae KimDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, 21565, Korea. kst2383@gilhospital.com.
Won-Jin YiInterdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. wjyi@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

Korea Medical Device Development Fund Grant by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT; Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy; Ministry of Health and Welfare; Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) 1711194231, KMDF_PR_20200901_0011National Research Foundation of Korea grant funded by the Korea government 2023R1A2C200532611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of the paranasal sinuses, including the frontal sinus (FS), ethmoid sinus (ES), sphenoid sinus (SS), and maxillary sinus (MS), plays an important role in supporting image-guided surgery (IGS) for sinusitis, facilitating safer intraoperative navigation by identifying anatomical variations and delineating surgical landmarks on CT imaging. To the best of our knowledge, no comparative studies of convolutional neural networks (CNNs), vision transformers (ViTs), and hybrid networks for segmenting each paranasal sinus in patients with sinusitis have been conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the segmentation performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks for individual paranasal sinuses with varying degrees of anatomical complexity and morphological and textural variations caused by sinusitis on CT images. The performance of CNNs, ViTs, and hybrid networks was compared using Jaccard Index (JI), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), precision (PR), recall (RC), and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) for segmentation accuracy metrics and the number of parameters (Params) and inference time (IT) for computational efficiency. The Swin UNETR hybrid network outperformed the other networks, achieving the highest segmentation scores, with a JI of 0.719, a DSC of 0.830, a PR of 0.935, and a RC of 0.758, and the lowest HD95 value of 10.529 with the smallest number of the model architectural parameter, with 15.705 M Params. Also, CoTr, another hybrid network, demonstrated superior segmentation performance compared to CNNs and ViTs, and achieved the fastest inference time with 0.149 IT. Compared with CNNs and ViTs, hybrid networks significantly reduced false positives and enabled more precise boundary delineation, effectively capturing anatomical relationships among the sinuses and surrounding structures. This resulted in the lowest segmentation errors near critical surgical landmarks. In conclusion, hybrid networks may provide a more balanced trade-off between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency, with potential applicability in clinical decision support systems for sinusitis.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerParanasal SinusesSinusitisTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansMaleSurgery, Computer-Assisted3D image segmentationConvolutional neural network (CNN)Hybrid networkParanasal sinusSinusitisVision transformer (ViT)

Identifiers

PMID40890292
PMCPMC12402304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.