ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of the potential geographic distribution of the Wilsonomyces carpophilus under multiple climate change scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting Potential Suitable Habitats of FourBiology · 2026Article
- Prediction of potential suitable habitat forFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wilsonomyces carpophilus is capable of causing shot-hole disease drupe fruit trees globally, severely affecting plant health and fruit quality, and posing a major threat to agriculture and forestry under climate change conditions. During 2021-2024, we conducted extensive field surveys in a total of 90 sample plots in the wild apricot distribution area of Ili, Xinjiang, China, based on different factors such as tree age, slope orientation, elevation, stand and climatic conditions.Pathogenic fungi were isolated and characterized through morphological and molecular approaches. This study predicts the current and future potential distribution of W. carpophilus using species distribution models (SDMs) and multivariate environmental similarity surface (MESS) analyses under SSP126 and SSP585 scenarios for the 2050 s and 2090s. Occurrence records from databases, field surveys, and reports provided 641 presence points, refined to 302 for model compatibility. Environmental variables from WorldClim were reduced to six key factors using variance inflation factor (VIF) analysis to minimize collinearity.Results indicate a substantial expansion of suitable habitat for W. carpophilus under future climates, particularly SSP585. High-suitability areas are projected to increase notably across Europe, North America, and parts of Asia by the 2090s, suggesting increased opportunities for establishment. MESS analysis showed significant shifts in environmental similarity, especially in northern regions, highlighting areas of increased uncertainty. The dominant drivers of suitability were Precipitation Seasonality, Mean Diurnal Range, and Precipitation of the Wettest Month. The response curves indicated a preference for moderate levels of these climatic factors.The findings emphasize the need for targeted monitoring and proactive management in regions projected to become highly suitable under future scenarios. Integrating SDMs into policy frameworks can guide resource allocation and adaptive management to mitigate risks. Future research should include ecological interactions, and advanced models such as Joint Species Distribution Models (JSDMs) to improve prediction accuracy. This study underscores the need for continuous monitoring and adaptive management to mitigate the risks posed by W. carpophilus under climate change, helping protect vulnerable agricultural and forestry systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.