Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890266›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A method for constructing digital twins of CNC machine tools feed systems based on hybrid mechanism-data.

Ruiqi Zhao, Hua Huang, Le Mei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruiqi ZhaoSchool of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China.
Hua Huang *School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China. hh318872@126.com.
Le Mei *School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou, 730050, China.

Funding

a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China 52365057a science and technology major special funding project from Gansu provincial 23ZDGE002a science and technology major special funding project from Wenzhou city G2023045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional CNC machine tool feed system models suffer from low simulation accuracy and limited generalizability. These issues arise from simplified process replication and rigid optimization methods based on mechanical knowledge. To address these challenges, this study proposes a new hybrid mechanism data-driven digital twin (DT) modeling framework. Firstly, a nonlinear coupling characterization method was developed by combining fuzzy proportional integral (PI) control with mechanical system dynamics. This method achieves real-time adaptive parameter updating of the feeding system, and compared with traditional models, the maximum error is reduced by 32.79%. To further address the inherent simplification characteristics of the mechanism model, a WOA-CNN-LSTM-Attention algorithm was independently constructed for compensation, and experimental verification through physical machine operation confirmed that the maximum error was reduced from 0.0576mm to 0.0121mm. Finally, an online recognition system with a recursive least squares multiplication with a forgetting factor was used to achieve fast parameter convergence: tracking for 0.005 seconds in simple cases and 0.01 seconds in complex cases, achieving real-time DT synchronization. This study provides a systematic solution for building stable and efficient DT systems in precision manufacturing applications.

Indexed as

CNC machine toolsDTForgetting factorsFuzzy PI controlWOA-CNN-LSTM-attention

Identifiers

PMID40890266
PMCPMC12402206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.