ArticleScientific reports2025
CT imaging findings of corona mortis and a new method for venous typing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Navigating pelvic anatomy for exenteration: a clinical guide for radiologists.The British journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze CT angiographic images to provide comprehensive data on the corona mortis (CMOR) and propose a new classification method for venous corona mortis (VCMOR). This retrospective study included 719 patients (378 males, mean age 55 years) who underwent CT-enhanced examination of the whole abdomen or pelvis. Patient demographics, variation incidence, vessel diameter and location, anatomical configuration, and acetabular distance were evaluated. 73.44% of patients had at least one arterial or venous CMOR, with bilateral occurrences being more common (P < 0.001). The incidence of arterial corona mortis (ACMOR) was 23.92%, and it could be categorized into four types. The mean distance from ACMOR to the pubic symphysis was 56.6 mm, with a greater distance in females (62.2 mm) compared to males (50.4 mm) (P < 0.001). The incidence of VCMOR was 68.43%, with a higher bilateral occurrence (P < 0.001). Fourteen anatomical configurations of the VCMOR were identified and classified into two types and five subtypes. The mean interacetabular distance was 200.5 mm. The origin and branching variation of CMOR vary considerably, especially the venous type, which is characterized by diversity and complexity and needs to be recognized before pelvic operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.