Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40890248›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Urban governance to support adaptable solutions for conversion of residual street spaces into social spaces.

Chiara Garau, Reza Askarizad, Francesco Pinna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chiara GarauDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123, Cagliari, Italy.
Reza AskarizadDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123, Cagliari, Italy. Reza.Askarizad@unica.it.
Francesco PinnaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture (DICAAR), University of Cagliari, Via Marengo 2, 09123, Cagliari, Italy.

Funding

NextGenerationEU SMART3R-FLITS (Project protocol: 2022J38SR9; CUP Code: F53D23005630006)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abandoned residual street spaces, frequently marginalised in formal urban planning frameworks, represent a significant yet unrealised resource for enhancing urban liveability, especially within the complexities of dense historic urban neighbourhoods. This study investigates how such underutilised spaces can be strategically transformed into vibrant social hubs. Focusing on the Castello neighbourhood in the historic centre of Cagliari, Italy, the research adopts a unique mixed-methods approach grounded in a sequential exploratory design. It begins with spatial analysis using space syntax techniques, including segment analysis, axial analysis, and visibility graph analysis, followed by GIS-based land use mapping and field-based qualitative assessments to identify and prioritise residual spaces based on their social potential. The findings highlight several high-potential sites characterised by pronounced spatial configuration and contextual qualities, suggesting practical insights into the design and governance of adaptive social spaces. The original contribution of this study lies in its incorporated and replicable methodological framework that combines quantitative spatial analysis with qualitative urban evaluation. The results not only advance the theoretical discourse on residual urban space but also provide pragmatic strategies for inclusive urban regeneration. The proposed framework is applicable across diverse urban contexts, offering a scalable model for cities aiming to enhance sociability through the adaptive reuse of neglected urban fragments.

Indexed as

Castello historic neighbourhoodLeftover spacesResidual street spacesSocial interactionSocio-spatial equitySpace syntax

Identifiers

PMID40890248
PMCPMC12402484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.