ArticleScientific reports2025
A graph neural network recommendation algorithm based on multi-scale attention and contrastive learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When facing sparse user-item interaction data, recommendation systems often struggle to learn high-quality representations, which in turn affects the recommendation performance. To address this issue, this paper proposes a graph neural network-based recommendation algorithm with multi-scale attention and contrastive learning (GR-MC). First, a dedicated graph structure augmentation strategy based on user-focused edge dropout is designed to intentionally reduce the dominance of high-degree user nodes in neighbor aggregation, effectively alleviating degree bias and improving the model's generalization ability. Second, a multi-scale attention embedding propagation mechanism is proposed to enhance the modeling of higher-order neighbor relationships. Finally, by treating node self-discrimination as a self-supervised task, contrastive learning is introduced to provide auxiliary signals for representation learning, thereby improving the discriminative ability of embeddings and the robustness of the model. Experimental results show that GR-MC outperforms existing methods on multiple public datasets, especially on the highly sparse Amazon-book dataset, where Recall@20 improves by 24.69%, fully demonstrating its effectiveness and robustness in sparse environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.