ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting factors associated with anxiety by patients undergoing treatment for infectious diseases using a random-forest machine learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with infectious diseases are often at increased risk of anxiety during treatment. The prevalence of anxiety and depression in infected people increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the risk factors for these mental health problems need to be urgently investigated. In this study, a cross-sectional study was conducted in Shanghai in 2022, which included 1283 patients and systematically assessed their sociodemographic characteristics and mental health status. A random forest classifier combined with the Boruta algorithm was used to screen predictors, and a nomogram was constructed based on the screening results. The results of the study showed that entrapment (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.09, P < 0.001), defeat (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, P < 0.01) and stigma (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.06, P < 0.001) were positively associated with anxiety, whereas social support (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96-0.98, P < 0.001) was negatively associated with anxiety. The C-index of the model was 0.858, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.861 (95% CI 0.834-0.888), and the P value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 0.07, indicating that the model fit well. Based on the Random Forest machine learning method, this study successfully constructed a prediction model for anxiety risk in COVID-19 patients, screening out key risk factors such as feeling trapped, frustration, stigma and social support, providing a scientific basis for clinical practice and public health, and helping to promote personalized interventions for anxiety and the building of a mental health support system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.