ArticleScientific reports2025
Harnessing remote sensing and machine learning techniques for detecting and monitoring the invasion of goldenrod invasive species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patterns, Associated Factors and Plant Diversity Characteristics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Invasive alien species, such as goldenrods (Solidago spp.), pose significant threats to biodiversity and ecosystem services across Europe. Effective monitoring of these species is essential for early intervention and informed management, yet traditional ground surveys are often labor-intensive and limited in scale. This study aims to evaluate the potential of remote sensing and machine learning for detecting and monitoring Solidago spp. in Kampinos National Park, Poland, using multitemporal imagery from Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope satellites. We compared the performance of Random Forest and One-Class Support Vector Machine classifiers across 17 classification scenarios incorporating spectral bands, vegetation indices, and temporal statistics. Our results showed that Random Forest consistently outperformed One-Class Support Vector Machine (OCSVM) by 1%-15%, achieving the highest F1-score of 0.98 using multitemporal Sentinel-2 data and 2%-29% using PlanetScope imagery. Sentinel-2 data, with its broader spectral range, provided better large-scale detection accuracy, while PlanetScope's higher spatial resolution enhanced local detail. Goldenrod patches are distinctive even in autumn and winter due to living or dry biomass that persists the whole year. In our study autumn imagery (October-November) yielded the most reliable detection due to distinct phenological characteristics of Solidago during this period. Importantly, our analysis demonstrates that the added complexity of vegetation indices does not necessarily improve classification accuracy for goldenrod detection. Our findings present high-accuracy invasive species monitoring approach and highlight the critical role of phenological timing in remote sensing-based ecological assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.