ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling teacher education students' adoption of large language models through an extended technology acceptance framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language model use in dental education: a cross-sectional multi-country study.Medical education online · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the deepening integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in the education sector, large language models (LLMs) have become essential tools for supporting writing tasks. As the future backbone of the teaching profession, the acceptance of these technologies by teacher education students not only influences their professional development but also plays a critical role in the digital transformation of future educational practices. However, existing research has yet to fully uncover the underlying mechanisms and influencing factors driving technology adoption behaviors within this group. This study extends the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) by incorporating key variables such as learning motivation, perceived risks, self-efficacy, and usage experience. Using structural equation modeling (SEM), we analyzed survey data from 552 fourth-year teacher education students in China to test the proposed hypotheses. The empirical findings reveal that subjective norms are the strongest predictor of behavioral intention, while perceived ease of use significantly and positively influences attitudes toward using LLMs. Among the risk dimensions, perceived time risk exerts a significant negative effect on perceived usefulness, whereas perceived privacy risk negatively impacts perceived ease of use. Additionally, usage experience fosters technology adoption behaviors by enhancing learning motivation. These findings not only extend the application boundaries of the TAM within the field of educational technology but also provide empirical evidence for educational institutions to design technology training programs and for model developers to optimize user experiences. Furthermore, they offer a theoretical framework for building digital literacy training systems for teacher education students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.