Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40889954›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2025

Risk stratification of chest pain in the emergency department using artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms.

Julian S Haimovich, Márton Kolossváry, Ridwan Alam, Raimon Padrós-Valls, Michael T Lu, Aaron D Aguirre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julian S HaimovichCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4346-6241
Márton KolossváryCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ridwan AlamCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Raimon Padrós-VallsCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Michael T LuCardiovascular Imaging Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Aaron D AguirreCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA aaguirre1@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-1646

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH TRAINING IN CARDIOLOGYT32HL007208 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Patrick Thomas Ellinor, David E Sosnovik · 1985 to 2026
$16.1M
Tissue Perfusion Pressure for Improved Management of Circulatory ShockR01HL173544 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Aaron D Aguirre · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL173544NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite standardised approaches, subjective assessment and inconsistent diagnostic testing for chest pain in the emergency department (ED) drive costs, disparities and adverse outcomes. Artificial intelligence offers potential to automate and improve risk stratification. METHODS AND

resultsUsing a retrospective cohort of 15 048 patients presenting to the ED of a tertiary care hospital, we trained a neural network classifier ('Chest Pain-AI' or 'CP-AI') to predict a 7-day composite endpoint of major cardiovascular diagnoses including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, aortic dissection and all-cause mortality. Inputs to CP-AI included age, sex, cardiac biomarkers (D-dimer or troponin I or T positivity) and numerical representations of presenting 12-lead ECGs. ECG representations were derived using a publicly available deep learning model known as patient contrastive learning of representations. In an external validation set of 14 476 patients, we evaluated CP-AI against comparator models, including a 'Biomarker Model' incorporating clinical data (age, sex, biomarker positivity), based on both the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). CP-AI outperformed the Biomarker Model in prediction of the 7-day composite endpoint with an AUROC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.83) vs 0.79 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.81) and an AUPRC of 0.46 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.49) vs 0.35 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.37) (p<0.05 for both comparisons).

conclusionsCP-AI, a fully automated neural network classifier, demonstrated superior performance in the prediction of 7-day major cardiovascular diagnoses for patients presenting with acute chest pain compared with conventional models trained on demographics and cardiac biomarkers. CP-AI may standardise and expedite risk stratification of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChest PainElectrocardiographyEmergency Service, HospitalAgedBiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkersAcute Coronary SyndromeChest PainElectrocardiography

Identifiers

PMID40889954
PMCPMC12406858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.