Trial reportOpen heart2025
Machine learning to predict high-risk coronary artery disease on CT in the SCOT-HEART trial.
Trial report in Open heart, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the intelligence revolution: transforming cardiovascular care through AI-driven innovation.Open heart · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: From Automated Acquisition to Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Decision Support.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a MACE risk prediction model based on CCTA-derived quantitative parameters: a proof-of-concept study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMachine learning based on clinical characteristics has the potential to predict coronary CT angiography (CCTA) findings and help guide resource utilisation.
methodsFrom the SCOT-HEART (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART) trial, data from 1769 patients was used to train and to test machine learning models (XGBoost, 10-fold cross validation, grid search hyperparameter selection). Two models were separately generated to predict the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and an increased burden of low-attenuation coronary artery plaque (LAP) using symptoms, demographic and clinical characteristics, electrocardiography and exercise tolerance testing (ETT).
resultsMachine learning predicted the presence of CAD on CCTA (area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.85) better than the 10-year cardiovascular risk score alone (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.70, 0.81, p=0.004). The most important features in this model were the 10-year cardiovascular risk score, age, sex, total cholesterol and an abnormal ETT. In contrast, the second model used to predict an increased LAP burden performed similarly to the 10-year cardiovascular risk score (AUC 0.75, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.80 vs AUC 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.77, p=0.08) with the most important features being the 10-year cardiovascular risk score, age, body mass index and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.
conclusionMachine learning models can improve prediction of the presence of CAD on CCTA, over the standard cardiovascular risk score. However, it was not possible to improve the prediction of an increased LAP burden based on clinical factors alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.