ArticleBone & joint open2025
Between-hospital variability in the management and outcomes of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The acute healthcare burden of periprosthetic fractures in a regional orthopaedic trauma unit.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFFs) following hip arthroplasty pose complex challenges, with differences in management and outcomes across healthcare facilities. However, there is limited published literature on such variability to inform improvement initiatives. This study aims to quantify the between-hospital variations in surgical management and short-term outcomes. Methods: Administrative hospitalizations data from all 177 NHS hospital Trusts in England were analyzed for patients aged 18 years and above with a primary diagnosis of POPFF between April 2016 and December 2022. Patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, procedures, length of stay, in-hospital mortality, 30-day total mortality (in or out of hospital), and emergency 30-day all-cause readmissions were extracted. Multilevel models with random intercepts for hospitals and funnel plots assessed the non-random variations between hospitals in procedures and outcomes. Results: Among 39,035 hospitalized patients, 66% were female (n = 25,720), with a median age of 82 years (IQR 73 to 88). Hospital variation existed in treatment outcomes, with adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for fixation without revision, revision, and no surgical procedure of 4.0%, 3.8%, and 2.4%, respectively. Funnel plots revealed hospital outliers for procedure choice after adjusting for age, sex, and number of comorbidities - among 177 hospitals, nine (5.1%) exceeded the upper 95% control limit for fixation and 17 (9.6%) did so for revision; outlier proportions were 14.1% for length of stay, 3.9% for emergency 30-day readmission, and 1.1% for mortality. Conclusion: Inter-hospital variation exists for the management and short-term outcomes following POPFFs in England. This warrants further explanation to better understand the reasons for this.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.