Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40889342›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2025

Ecological and Mutation-Order Speciation in Senecio.

Maddie E James, Maria C Melo, Federico Roda, Diana Bernal-Franco, Melanie J Wilkinson, Gregory M Walter, Huanle Liu, Jan Engelstädter, Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coupling of Barriers to Gene Exchange: Causes and Consequences.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Genomics of plant speciation.Plant communications · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Phenotypic and genotypic parallel evolution in parapatric ecotypes of Senecio.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maddie E JamesSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6296-0187
Maria C MeloSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2618-0356
Federico RodaSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7923-9713
Diana Bernal-FrancoSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0663-881X
Melanie J WilkinsonSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1400-3176
Gregory M WalterSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0883-3440
Huanle LiuSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-3698
Jan EngelstädterSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-918X
Daniel Ortiz-BarrientosSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7493-416X

Funding

Australian Research Council DP120104559Australian Research Council DP190103039Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture CE200100015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection shapes how new species arise, yet the mechanisms that generate reproductive barriers remain actively debated. Although ecological divergence in contrasting environments and mutation-order processes in similar environments are often viewed as distinct speciation mechanisms, we show they can occur simultaneously and act as part of a continuum of selective pressures. In the Senecio lautus species complex, Dune and Headland ecotypes have evolved repeatedly along the Australian coastline. Through crossing experiments and field studies, we find that divergent natural selection promotes strong reproductive isolation between the Dune and Headland ecotypes. While uniform selection maintains reproductive compatibility among ecologically similar Dune populations, geographically distant Headland populations have evolved reproductive barriers despite their convergent prostrate phenotypes, likely driven by adaptation to subtle environmental differences between each Headland location. To understand how this habitat heterogeneity contributes to patterns of reproductive isolation, we extend previous theoretical work on the accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities to account for environmental gradients and polygenic adaptation. We show that the probability of reproductive isolation depends on three factors: how similar the environments are, how complex the genetic architecture is and how selection coefficients are distributed among beneficial mutations. These theoretical findings explain how reproductive isolation arises in systems like Senecio, where multiple forms of selection jointly drive speciation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationReproductive IsolationSelection, GeneticSenecioAnimalsAustraliaEcosystemEcotypeGenetics, PopulationMutationPhenotypeadaptive divergenceDobzhansky‐Muller incompatibilitiesnatural selectionparallel evolutionparapatric ecotypesreproductive isolation

Identifiers

PMID40889342
PMCPMC12617340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.