ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2026
Robotic-assisted anterior and posterior cervical spine surgeries.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Woodpecker variable-speed drilling protocol for robot-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement: technique and a consecutive series of 1027 screws.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Extended uses of robots in spine surgery beyond thoracolumbar pedicle screws: A narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCervical spine surgeries pose unique challenges due to the proximity of critical structures and limited visualization with traditional techniques. Robotic assistance offers potential solutions by providing precise navigation and reducing radiation exposure. We present a series of 30 consecutive patients undergoing various cervical spine procedures utilizing the MazorX Stealth Edition (MXSE) robotic system with intraoperative imaging.
methodsAnterior and posterior surgeries were performed using the MXSE system. Surgical parameters, implant placement accuracy, and patient outcomes were assessed. Data analysis included anthropometric measurements, surgical times, blood loss, radiation exposure, and patient-reported outcomes.
resultsMean age was 52.43 years, with 43.33% females. Procedures included anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, corpectomy, disc replacement, and posterior decompression and fusion. Implant placements were accurate, with no neurological deficits or reoperations. Surgical parameters were comparable to standard techniques. DISCUSSION: Robotic assistance offers accurate implant placement and reduced radiation exposure. Challenges such as vertebra segmentation and surgical approach were addressed. Further research and instrument development are needed for wider adoption.
conclusionRobotic navigation in cervical spine surgeries enhances precision and safety. Continued advancements in technology and technique are essential for broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40889052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.