ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2025
Characterizing Project ECHO Autism Case Recommendations and Implementation.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ECHO Ontario Autism was developed to grow capacity by building community providers' knowledge, skills, and confidence. This research summarizes the recommendations provided to presenting physicians through the ECHO Ontario Autism program, participant-reported recommendation uptake, reasons recommendations were not enacted, and participant perceptions of the program's impact. Case-specific surveys were sent to participating presenting community physicians to determine whether they implemented recommendations and to solicit their views on the program's clinical impact. Recommendations were classified by two researchers who inductively coded responses on reasons that recommendations were rejected and clinical impacts of ECHO Ontario Autism using conventional content analysis. The analysis included 32 cases presented by 18 physicians, resulting in 289 recommendations. Nearly three quarters (74%) of recommendations were implemented (n = 214). Recommendations not enacted were most often due to reasons relating to the child/family (e.g., family found alternatives). Providers indicated that ECHO Ontario Autism positively influenced their approach to care, increased their diagnostic capabilities, and provided interpersonal benefits with families and colleagues. Recommendations from ECHO Ontario Autism have a moderate-to-high rate of uptake in real-world practice. Participation in ECHO Ontario Autism provided benefits extending beyond recommendations for specific cases presented in the program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40889033What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.