ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Single vs. staged PSARP for rectovestibular fistula: a 25-year study on complications, continence, and quality of life.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates and compares surgical complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life between single-stage and staged posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) procedures in female patients with Rectovestibular fistula (RVF) over a 25-year period.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 54 female patients with RVF treated between 1999 and 2024. Patients were categorized into Group 1 (n = 42, single-stage PSARP) and Group 2 (n = 12, staged PSARP). Demographics, associated anomalies, postoperative complications, Krickenbeck continence scores, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) scores were analyzed and compared.
resultsGroup 1 showed significantly higher rates of surgical site infection (22.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.01), wound dehiscence (17.8% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.03), and mucosal prolapse (13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.001). Conversely, anal stenosis occurred only in Group 2 (16.7%, p = 0.001). Voluntary bowel movements (88% vs. 83%, p = 0.86) and reoperation rates (8.9% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.88) were similar across groups. Longitudinal analysis revealed progressive improvement in bowel control and quality of life with age, irrespective of surgical method. PedsQL scores increased from 73.4 in early childhood to 85.5 in adulthood.
conclusionBoth single-stage and staged PSARP are effective in achieving long-term continence in RVF patients. While the single-stage approach carries higher early wound-related risks, it remains a viable option for well-selected, low-risk patients. Staged repair may be more appropriate for high-risk cases to reduce early complications. Individualized surgical planning and long-term follow-up are essential to optimize functional and psychosocial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40888960What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.