ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A comparative analysis of pre-operative factors, intra-operative events and post-operative outcomes assessing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for robotic partial nephrectomy in T1 renal cancer: a multicenter international experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experience of Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.World journal of oncology · 2026Article
- Comment on "A comparative analysis of pre-operative factors, intra-operative events and post-operative outcomes assessing transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches for robotic partial nephrectomy in T1 renal cancer: a multicenter international experience".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our study is to compare and assess the correlation of preoperative factors, intraoperative events and post-operative outcomes of robot assisted transperitoneal (RATP) and robot assisted retroperitoneal (RARP) partial nephrectomy (PN) in T1 renal cancer. Data from 2609 patients during the period of 10 years who underwent either RATP or RARP partial nephrectomies was retrospectively analyzed. We compared preoperative factors (age, BMI, tumour size/stage, PADUA score, preoperative eGFR, history of previous abdominal and ipsilateral surgery), intraoperative events: operative time (OT), warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), and post-operative outcomes: complications, eGFR, positive surgical margins (PSM), and death due to disease (DOD) or due to other causes (DOC) and survival rates. Patients in the RATP-PN group were younger, PADUA score was similar in both groups-9, tumour size was smaller in RARP-PN. OT (103 min. vs 86 min) and WIT (23 min vs 10 min) were longer in RATP-PN (p < 0.001). EBL was higher in RATP-PN and in T1b tumours (p = 0). At 40 months follow-up, eGFR was same in both groups. There were slightly more Clavien-Dindo ≥3a complications in RARP-PN cohort. T1b tumours showed higher EBL than T1a tumours (p = 0). At end of follow-up, in RP group, 79.86% were alive, 3.87% DOD and 16.86% DOC; in TP cohorts, at 40 months of follow-up, 82.68% were alive, 2.66% DOD and 14.66% DOC. There is no relation between preoperative demographic or tumour factors on post operative complications. Tumour size and PADUA score had no effect on EBL Advanced age is a strong predictor for DOC in both T1a and T1b tumours; high PADUA score is associated with DOD in T1a tumours but not in T1b tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40888954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.