ArticleLasers in medical science2025
Photobiomodulation vs. nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after diode laser excision of lower lip lesions: a case series.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of Near Infrared Light on Surgical Wound Healing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare photobiomodulation (PBMT) and the use of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), after surgical removal of lower lip lesions with a high-power diode laser. This was a series of 13 cases, in which all subjects were treated with high-power diode laser (808 nm) in continuous mode, with a power between 2.0 and 2.5 W. In the experimental group (G1) (n = 7), the subjects underwent PBMT using a low-power laser (LPL) (660 nm, 1 J, 40 mW, spot area of 0.04 cm², punctual), on the first, third and seventh post-surgery day. In the control group (G2) (n = 6), a NSAID (nimesulide 100 mg, every 12 h, for five days) was prescribed, and the LPL device was positioned, without being activated, to mimic the PBMT. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to assess postoperative pain. The size of the surgical wound was measured immediately after surgery, as well as after two, seven, 15 and 30 days. For statistical analysis, the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Most subjects were male (53.8%) with a mean age of 44.7 years. Subjects in G1 reported less pain during follow-ups than those in G2, but with no significant differences between groups in all experimental times (p > 0.05). In the analysis, after seven days, the G1 presented a smaller surgical wound (p = 0.017). PBMT can be an alternative in relation to the use of nimesulide, allowing for less painful symptoms and optimization of the healing process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40888946What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.