ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2025
Coupling electrochemical and spectroscopic methods for river water dissolved organic matter characterization.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring dissolved organic matter (DOM) in surface waters is essential for assessing ecosystem health and detecting pollution. However, conventional spectroscopic techniques often provide limited information about the electrochemical behavior of DOM. This study integrates electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with classical methods such as UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectroscopies to improve DOM characterization in river water samples. In particular, this coupling provides additional insights into the electrochemical properties of DOM, which are not captured by conventional spectroscopic techniques. This study combined multiple data sources, including physicochemical parameters (e.g., water temperature, pH, conductivity), EIS spectral scores, fluorescence indices, and DOM fractions resolved by multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) applied to excitation-emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence data. The results from these different methods were then merged into a single dataset for a global principal component analysis (PCA), which allowed us to identify shared patterns and correlations across methods. The results revealed that low-altitude rivers showed the highest DOM content, followed by mid-altitude rivers, while high-altitude rivers presented the lowest. The PCA model indicated that low-frequency regions in the EIS spectra correlated with higher DOM content, whereas mid- to high-frequency regions were associated with lower DOM levels. These frequency-dependent patterns reflected differences in charge transfer and dielectric behavior of DOM in the river samples, which are not accessible through optical techniques. This highlights the potential of EIS as a complementary tool that provides electrochemical information on DOM composition for better water quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.