ArticleSocial cognitive and affective neuroscience2025
The impact of affective congruence on charitable giving.
Article in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although charitable aid requests often include multiple salient affective features, their interactive effects on donation behavior and the neuropsychological mechanisms underlying their combined influence remain unclear. In four studies, including six behavioral experiments and one Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiment, we examine how the affective congruence of request features influences giving decisions. Across studies, requests with affectively congruent features, regardless of valence, elicited greater donations. The impact of affective congruence was mediated by increased positive aroused affect experienced by donors. Convergently, at the neural level, congruent requests elicited greater activity in the Nucleus Accumbens (NAcc), a brain region associated with positive aroused affect. Increased NAcc activity subsequently predicted donation decisions, bridging responses to stimulus input and behavioral output. These findings suggest that both positive and negatively valenced charitable requests can effectively increase donations if their salient affective features are congruent through neuro-affective mechanisms that support positive aroused affect. These results contribute to a deeper understanding of how affective congruence in charitable appeals engage neural reward systems to drive prosocial behavior. By identifying the NAcc as a bridge from request stimulus to giving behavior, these data illustrate the intersection of emotion, decision-making, and prosociality at both behavioral and neural levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.