ArticleJournal of global health2025
Effective coverage of newborn postnatal care: assessing the service contact-content gap in 32 low- and middle-income countries using household survey data.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-quality postnatal care (PNC) is essential for newborn survival. However, newborn PNC coverage indicators do not reflect the quality of care received. We estimated effective coverage of newborn PNC by incorporating content of care and calculated the contact-content gap in 32 low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Using household survey data from 32 LMICs, we defined effective coverage of newborn PNC as the proportion of mothers or babies who received five essential signal functions as part of their newborn's PNC check by a medically trained provider within the first two days of birth. We calculated the contact-content gap as the absolute difference between service coverage of newborn PNC and effective coverage of newborn PNC, in percentage points (pp). We described inequalities in effective coverage of newborn PNC by mother's age, parity, wealth, education, residence, antenatal care seeking, delivery facility type, and managing authority. Results: The median effective coverage of newborn PNC was 27.5% across countries, ranging from 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.6, 2.7) in Burundi to 78.3% (95% CI = 74.3, 81.8) in Armenia. We identified large PNC contact-content gaps, up to 52.6 pp in The Gambia. Content of care was generally poor, with only 37.1% of mothers across countries receiving counselling on newborn danger signs. We found important demographic, socioeconomic, and health systems inequalities in newborn PNC effective coverage, disproportionately favouring newborns whose mother was older (35-49 years), primiparous, lived in urban areas, belonged to the wealthiest households, had at least secondary education, and delivered in a hospital or the private sector in most countries. Conclusions: In most countries, a substantial number of newborns who are checked during PNC do not receive all basic services. Effective coverage measures offer a more comprehensive estimate for assessing service gaps, driving action, and ensuring health gains. Addressing the missed opportunities of inadequate care content and focussing on equity will be critical to improve survival of all mothers and newborns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.