Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888591›Full record

ReviewScience progress

The computational model lifecycle: Opportunities and challenges for computational medicine in the healthcare ecosystem.

Sara Bridio, Pierre Deceuninck, Maurice Whelan, Andrew Worth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara BridioEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-9730
Pierre DeceuninckEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Maurice WhelanEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7186-1663
Andrew WorthEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5303-0452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational medicine promises significant advancements in healthcare, using physics-based simulations and artificial intelligence to optimise disease diagnosis, personalise treatment strategies and accelerate medical innovation. Biomedical research efforts are generating a growing number of computational models of human pathophysiology and medical treatments, with advanced applications in areas such as cardiovascular diseases, orthopaedics and cancer diagnosis. However, the widespread adoption of these models is hindered by technological and regulatory barriers. This article provides an overview of the potential impact, needs and challenges of the adoption of in silico medicine in the healthcare ecosystem, with a focus on initiatives to sustain this technology within the European Union's regulatory environment. The article introduces the concept of the 'computational model lifecycle' as a framework to describe the stages from academic research to pre-clinical and clinical applications, analysing key opportunities and challenges in translating these technologies at each stage. These challenges are associated with data management, standards for model credibility assessment, transparency of regulatory frameworks, and clinical integration. The article highlights European initiatives such as the European Health Data Space and the Virtual Human Twins Initiative, aimed at fostering the development and application of computational medicine in healthcare.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyComputer SimulationDelivery of Health CareArtificial IntelligenceHumansComputational medicinecomputer modelling and simulationhealth datain silico medicinemodel credibilityregulatory framework

Identifiers

PMID40888591
PMCPMC12402556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.