ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Lifespan Tree of Brain Anatomy: Diagnostic Values for Motor and Cognitive Neurodegenerative Diseases.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Redefining Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using AI-Driven Brain Volumetry.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Reliability and diagnostic performance of an automated MRI-based classifier compared with radiologists in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Lifespan Tree of Brain Anatomy: Diagnostic Values for Motor and Cognitive Neurodegenerative Diseases.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by overlapping symptoms, may be challenging. Brain imaging coupled with artificial intelligence has been previously proposed for diagnostic support, but most of these methods have been trained to discriminate only isolated diseases from controls. Here, we develop a novel machine learning framework, named lifespan tree of brain anatomy, dedicated to the differential diagnosis between multiple diseases simultaneously. It integrates the modeling of volume changes for 124 brain structures during the lifespan with nonlinear dimensionality reduction and synthetic sampling techniques to create easily interpretable representations of brain anatomy over the course of disease progression. As clinically relevant proof-of-concept applications, we constructed a cognitive lifespan tree of brain anatomy for the differential diagnosis of six causes of neurodegenerative dementia and a motor lifespan tree of brain anatomy for the differential diagnosis of four causes of parkinsonism using 37,594 MRIs as a training dataset. This original approach significantly enhanced the efficiency of differential diagnosis in the external validation cohort of 1754 cases, outperforming existing state-of-the-art machine learning techniques. Lifespan tree holds promise as a valuable tool for differential diagnosis in relevant clinical conditions, especially for diseases still lacking effective biological markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.