ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Prediction of Activity and Selectivity Profiles of Sigma Receptor Ligands Using Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Reproducible Hierarchical Virtual Screening Framework Integrating Scaffold-Aware Machine Learning, Ensemble Docking, and Molecular Dynamics: Application to IDO1.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Computational Discovery of Novel SGLT2 Inhibitors from Eight Selected Medicine Food Homology Herbs Using a Multi-Stage Virtual Screening Pipeline.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sigma (σ) receptors (SRs) have emerged as important therapeutic targets due to their roles in various biological pathways. They are classified into two subtypes: S1R, primarily distributed in the central nervous system and related to neuroprotection and neurodegenerative diseases, and S2R mainly expressed in cancer cells and associated with cell proliferation and apoptosis, as well as in neurons. Although S1R and S2R exhibit structural differences in receptor architecture and assembly, they share similar binding site features and ligand recognition mechanisms. This similarity underscores the importance of identifying selective ligands for therapeutic design, especially given the distinct physiological functions of these receptors. In this project, we developed three distinct machine learning (ML) approaches based on classification, regression, and multiclassification models to predict the activity and selectivity profiles of SR ligands. High-quality data sets were curated from public and in-house source; in turn, the data sets were systematically organized and processed for each workflow. Models were built using molecular descriptors and fingerprints, including Mordred, RDKit, ECFP4, ECFP6, and MACCS keys, and trained with various ML algorithms such as extra trees, random forest, support vector machine,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.