ArticleJournal of diabetes2025
Associations of Stressful Life Events With Diabetes Incidence in China: Insights From the China Kadoorie Biobank.
Article in Journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations of Stressful Life Events With Diabetes Incidence in China: Insights From the China Kadoorie Biobank.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited empirical evidence exists on the link between exposure to various stressful life events (SLEs) and the heightened risk of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) within the mainland Chinese population.
methodsWe conducted this prospective cohort study with 455,464 participants from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB); we examined associations between SLEs exposures and DM outcomes. We employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for potential confounders.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 14,218 DM cases were identified. A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of SLEs, personal-related events, and the risk of DM. The higher the number of SLEs experienced, the higher the risk of developing diabetes (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01-1.12); individuals who experienced personal-related events had a higher risk of developing DM (HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.01-1.36), and those who experienced marital separation/divorce had a 53% increased risk of DM (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12-2.09). Subgroup analyses revealed effect modifications based on birth cohort, sex, and area.
conclusionBy exploring the association of multiple SLEs with the development of DM, we identified marital separation/divorce as a driver of increased DM risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.