ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
The risk of basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin cancer incidence and external radiation in the updated National Registry for radiation workers cohort in the UK.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiology of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer in Europe over the Last Decade: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Review
- The risk of basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin cancer incidence and external radiation in the updated National Registry for radiation workers cohort in the UK.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents the most comprehensive evaluation to date of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) risk in the UK National Registry for Radiation Workers, examining separately both basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The cohort includes 172,452 workers with over 5.3 million person-years of follow-up (1955-2011) and a mean cumulative dose of 24.9 mSv. Cumulative external radiation was assessed using the personal dose equivalent Hp(10), and Poisson regression estimates the excess relative risk per Sievert (ERR/Sv) of skin cancer incidence. A total of 5748 NMSC cases were identified (4288 BCC, 818 SCC). BCC showed good evidence of a linear dose-response (ERR/Sv = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.39-1.39; p <.001), but this weakened after adjusting for anatomical location as a proxy for ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure (ERR/Sv = 0.15; 95% CI: -0.17-0.54; p = 0.28). However, BCC risk remained elevated among workers who were monitored for internal exposure and those workers first employed before 1960, both of whom experienced higher doses and longer follow-up. SCC showed only limited evidence of a radiation dose-response (ERR/Sv = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.03-2.05; p = 0.04), driven largely by a small number of cases at high dose, and lost significance after adjustment for anatomical location. Most BCC and SCC tumors occurred on sun-exposed areas, with notably higher BCC risks on the upper limbs. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for UVR exposure in occupational radiation studies of skin cancer and support further research with individual UVR exposure data and skin dose data to better quantify these risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.