Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888281›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2025

Neurologists' perspectives on SUDEP communication: A comparative study across five European countries.

Seungyoun Moon, Lance Watkins, Johan Zelano, Vicente Villanueva, Nandan Ravichandra, Zsófia Jordán, Anna Kelemen, Paul Bassett, Oliver Johannes Henning, Torbjörn Tomson and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seungyoun MoonNorth London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Lance WatkinsPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Johan ZelanoUniversity of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9445-4545
Vicente VillanuevaHospital Universitario La Fe (Full Member of EpiCARE), Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2080-8042
Nandan RavichandraUniversity of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7015-7965
Zsófia JordánSemmelweis University (Full Member of EpiCARE), Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6195-9130
Anna KelemenSemmelweis University (Full Member of EpiCARE), Budapest, Hungary.
Paul BassettStatsconsultancy Ltd, Amersham, UK.
Oliver Johannes HenningNational Centre for Epilepsy (Full Member of EpiCARE), Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Torbjörn TomsonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rohit ShankarPeninsula School of Medicine, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe leading cause of epilepsy mortality is Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). National and international guidelines recommend that people with epilepsy are counseled on SUDEP risk at the point of diagnosis or at the earliest opportunity. This study compares neurologist views from five European countries on attitudes and relevance of SUDEP communication.

methodsA cross-sectional online survey of 17 Likert questions using validated themes was circulated via different ILAE and/or equivalent organizations using a non-discriminatory exponential snowballing technique, leading to a non-probability sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests. Significance was accepted at p < 0.05.

resultsThere were 313 responses from neurologists from across five countries (UK, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Hungary). Significant heterogeneity (4%-53%) was found between neurologists of different countries in discussing SUDEP with a person with newly diagnosed epilepsy. There were significant inter-country differences in the amount of time neurologists spent in epilepsy care generally and SUDEP discussions particularly. Significant inter-country barriers to SUDEP communication included time constraints, clinical complexity, perceived fear of causing distress to the patient, presumed poor ability of patient/carers to comprehend risk, and a self-perceived low risk of SUDEP. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite all international guidelines stating the need/importance to discuss SUDEP with all PWE, there remains hesitation, avoidance, and subjectivity in neurologists having SUDEP-related conversations, more so in mainland European countries (Norway, Sweden, Spain and Hungary) than in the UK. Training and education are required to improve communication, engagement, and decision-making. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of death in people with epilepsy, and international guidelines recommend discussing this risk early after diagnosis. This study surveyed 313 neurologists from the UK, Norway, Sweden, Spain, and Hungary to understand their views on SUDEP communication. Results showed large differences between countries in how often and how openly neurologists discussed SUDEP. Barriers included time constraints, fear of upsetting patients, and doubts about patients' understanding. UK neurologists were more likely to have these conversations than their European peers. More training is needed to support consistent and effective SUDEP communication across countries.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationEpilepsyNeurologistsPhysician-Patient RelationsSudden Unexpected Death in EpilepsyAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansHungaryMaleMiddle AgedNorwaySpainepilepsy mortalityseizuresSUDEPSUDEP communication

Identifiers

PMID40888281
PMCPMC12514370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.