Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888275›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Long-term human papillomavirus genotype-specific risk of cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesion and cancer-By age group and triage cytology.

Maija Vahteristo, Sirpa Heinävaara, Joakim Dillner, Ilkka Kalliala, Pekka Nieminen, Tytti Sarkeala, Maarit K Leinonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maija VahteristoFinnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4849-1211
Sirpa HeinävaaraFinnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.
Joakim DillnerCenter for Cervical Cancer Elimination, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-6506
Ilkka KallialaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pekka NieminenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tytti SarkealaFinnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland.
Maarit K LeinonenData and Analytics, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Competitive Government Health Research Funding TYH2023227Syöpäsäätiö 230070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes possess different cervical high-grade intraepithelial lesion and cancer (CIN2+) risks. HPV genotyping is a promising method to increase the specificity of primary HPV screening, but the optimal management of the infections with different genotypes has not been established. We aimed to assess long-term HPV genotype-specific CIN2+ risks, stratified by age and triage cytology result in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. This is a prospective study of 5253 HPV-positive individuals from the Finnish randomized HPV screening trial, with up to 18 years of follow-up. HPV-positive samples were genotyped using Luminex and BD Onclarity assays. The genotyping data were linked to data from four different nationwide health registries. The primary outcome was HPV genotype-specific cumulative incidence of CIN2+. The CIN2+ cumulative incidence was the highest for HPV16 (38.1%), followed by HPV33/58 (25.4%) and HPV31 (22.2%). The lowest incidences were observed for HPV56/59/66 (4.4%), HPV35/39/68 (6.5%), and HPV51 (7.5%). Individuals aged 50 or older at the entry test had lower cumulative incidences for the highest-risk genotypes. The cytology stratification showed that for the infections with the highest risks, normal cytology triage did not guarantee a low CIN2+ risk. On the other hand, HPV51 and HPV56/59/66 had a low risk even with an abnormal cytology result. The findings suggest that individuals with HPV16, HPV33/58, and HPV31 infections could be referred immediately to colposcopy. Sending individuals with low-risk genotypes, HPV35/39/68, HPV51, or HPV56/59/66 infections with normal cytology back to routine screening could increase screening specificity.

Indexed as

PapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedAge FactorsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleFinlandGenotypeHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedProspective Studiescervical cancerHPV genotypesHPV genotyping triageHPV screeninghuman papillomavirus

Identifiers

PMID40888275
PMCPMC12712356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.