ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2025
Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.
Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Under-Five Mortality in Humanitarian Emergencies: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Mobile Phone Survey Estimates From Burkina Faso.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Article
- Do Mobile Phone Surveys Supplement Other Mortality Surveillance Methods? Results From a National Study in Bangladesh.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2026Article
- Can mobile phone surveys accurately measure the coverage of maternal healthcare services? Results from the Rapid Mortality Mobile Phone Survey (RaMMPS) study in Mozambique.Oxford open digital health · 2026Article
- Measuring childhood mortality through mobile phone interviews in Mozambique.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2025Article
- Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake and hesitancy among women of reproductive age in Mozambique.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesChildhood mortality is a key indicator of progress in health and development in low- and middle-income countries, traditionally measured through household surveys with face-to-face interviews. This study explored an alternative approach that used mobile phone interviews with women in Mozambique.
methodsUsing two sampling approaches, we interviewed women of reproductive age about their pregnancy history through mobile phones. The first method used an existing database of phone numbers collected from a national mortality surveillance, Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA). The second employed random digit dialling (RDD) to generate phone numbers. The COMSA phone sample successfully reached 13,545 women while the RDD sample reached 10,359 women. We compared neonatal (NMR), infant (IMR) and under-five mortality rates (U5MR) to estimates from the United Nations (UN), COMSA and the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). The mobile phone-based mortality rates were adjusted using the raking approach.
resultsThe mobile phone interviews incorporating pregnancy history yielded recent childhood mortality rates comparable to those reported by the DHS. The 2020-2021 U5MRs were estimated at 59.3 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 41.9-76.7) in the COMSA phone sample and 44.9 (95% CI: 9.0-80.7) in the RDD sample, compared to 59.6 (95% CI: 53.7-65.6) in the DHS. These estimates were lower than the UN projections at 71.6 (95% CI: 65.5-87.1) and COMSA at 80.0 (95% CI: 69.0-91.0). We observed similar trends for NMR and IMR. Childhood mortality trends were comparable between the COMSA phone sample and the DHS sample. In contrast, the RDD sample appeared to consistently underestimate childhood mortality compared to the other samples.
conclusionMobile phone surveys, including standard full pregnancy history tools, produced recent childhood mortality levels and trends for national and subnational levels similar to face-to-face approaches such as the DHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.