ReviewImmunotherapy2025
Scalable and cost-effective CAR-T exosome therapies: challenges and future directions.
Review in Immunotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Advances in stem cell and exosome-based therapies for dry eye disease].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Review
- Exosome-Inspired Nanocarriers in Cancer Therapy: Bio-Derived Nanotechnology Meets Nano Drug Delivery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized hematological cancer treatment but faces challenges in solid tumors, including poor infiltration, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and toxicity. CAR-T cell-derived exosomes (CAR-T exosomes) offer a promising alternative by inheriting CAR-mediated targeting and cytotoxic molecules (e.g., perforin, granzyme B), while avoiding issues such as CRS. Their nanoscale size enhances tumor penetration, and the lack of MHC reduces immunogenicity, which supports "off-the-shelf" applications. However, scalability remains limited by low yields from traditional isolation methods [e.g., ultracentrifugation (UC)], costly equipment, and inconsistent purification. This review summarizes recent advances in CAR-T exosome biology, scalable production strategies, and combinatorial approaches to overcome immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine modulation). We also discuss clinical prospects and future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.