Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888157›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2026

AI-driven WHO 2021 classification of gliomas based only on H&E-stained slides.

Shubham Innani, W Robert Bell, MacLean P Nasrallah, Bhakti Baheti, Spyridon Bakas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shubham InnaniDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3616-0308
W Robert BellDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
MacLean P NasrallahDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bhakti BahetiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Spyridon BakasDepartment of Computer Science, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Funding

Privacy-Aware Federated Learning for Breast Cancer Risk AssessmentU24CA279629 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Spyridon Bakas · 2023 to 2026
$2.9M
The Federated Tumor Segmentation (FeTS) platform: An intuitive tool facilitating secure multi-institutional collaborationU01CA242871 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BAKAS, SPYRIDON · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
Indiana University Pervasive Technology InstituteInformatics Technology for Cancer ResearchNCI NIH HHS U01 CA242871NCI NIH HHS U24 CA279629NIH HHS U01CA242871NIH HHS U24CA279629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO 2021 classification criteria for adult-type diffuse glioma integrate histology with molecular profiling for conclusive diagnosis. Since molecular profiling can be expensive and time-consuming, often necessitating outsourcing or leading to the "not otherwise specified (NOS) label," this study develops an AI-driven WHO 2021 classification of gliomas solely from H&E whole-slide images (WSIs).

methodsOur pipeline is based on a multi-institutional dataset reclassified per WHO 2021 guidelines. This dataset includes (a) Primarily US-based TCGA-GBM/TCGA-LGG (n = 1,320) for model training, independently evaluated on two hold-out sets, (b) Austria-based EBRAINS (n = 794), and (c) India-based IPD-Brain (n = 304). Each WSI undergoes pre-processing followed by quantitative benchmarking across (i) eight pathology foundation models (FM), (ii) nine aggregation methods (AM), and (iii) 15 combinations of magnification levels through a late fusion approach. Model interpretability conducted through heatmaps highlights distinct, identifiable morphology features.

resultsOur best-performing combination of FM, AM, and multi-magnification achieved an AUC of 97.95% on the training cohort, 96.30% on EBRAINS (set 1), and 92.61% on IPD (set 2). The results yield the following key insights: (1) domain-specific FMs outperform ImageNet-based models, (2) AMs, while theoretically promising yield larger performance improvements when used with ImageNet-based feature extractor rather than FMs, and (3) Fusion of multiple magnifications adds value in performance.

conclusionDetermining glioma diagnosis directly from H&E slides can obviate the need for molecular profiling, expedite conclusive diagnosis, and, hence, clinical decision-making. These findings motivate the development of advanced domain-relevant FMs and the design of more adaptable slide-level aggregation techniques.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansWorld Health Organizationcomputational pathologyembedding aggregationfoundation modelsgliomamulti-magnification

Identifiers

PMID40888157
PMCPMC12962625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.