Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40888140›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2025

The effect of increasing standardized ileal digestible histidine:lysine ratio during lactation on sow and litter performance.

Abigail K Jenkins, Mikayla S Spinler, Jason C Woodworth, Jordan T Gebhardt, Robert D Goodband, Mike D Tokach, Joel M DeRouchey, Katelyn N Gaffield, Keith D Haydon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abigail K JenkinsDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Mikayla S SpinlerDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Jason C WoodworthDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7268-4278
Jordan T GebhardtDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Robert D GoodbandDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Mike D TokachDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Joel M DeRoucheyDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Katelyn N GaffieldDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Keith D HaydonCJ Bio America, Downers Grove, IL, USA.

Funding

CJ Bio AmericaKansas Agricultural Experiment Station
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NRC (National Research Council. 2012) requirement estimate for His is approximately 20 g/d for lactating sows. This estimate is based on factorial models and there is limited empirical data available. A total of 88 lactating sows (Line 241, DNA) and their litters were used to evaluate the effects of increasing standardized ileal digestible (SID) His:Lys ratio on sow and litter performance. Sows were blocked by parity and body weight (BW) on approximately day 110 of gestation and allotted to one of three dietary treatments containing increasing SID His:Lys ratios (40%, 50%, or 60% of Lys). The 40% His:Lys ratio diet was corn and soybean meal-based and formulated to 1.05% SID Lys with no added L-His. Sows were allowed 2.72 kg/d of their treatment diet from day 110 of gestation until farrowing after which they were provided ad libitum access to treatment diets. Pigs were cross-fostered by day 2 of lactation within treatment to equalize litter size (approximately 14.2 pigs). Sow BW, backfat, caliper score, and loin depth on day 110 of gestation and at weaning were not affected (P > 0.10) by increasing SID His:Lys ratio. Increasing SID His:Lys ratio tended (linear, P = 0.085) to decrease percentage of pigs born alive due to an increase (linear, P = 0.049) in the percentage of stillborn pigs. Litter weight on day 7 and the day before weaning (day 17) tended to increase and then decrease (quadratic, P ≤ 0.062) as SID His:Lys ratio increased. Pig average daily gain (ADG) from day 7 to day 17 tended to increase (linear, P = 0.10) with increasing SID His:Lys ratio, though litter ADG and preweaning survival remained unaffected (P > 0.10). Increasing SID His:Lys ratio increased and then decreased (quadratic, P = 0.027) calculated total milk yield from day 2 of lactation until day 17 and tended to increase and then decrease calculated average daily milk yield (quadratic, P = 0.078), but did not affect milk composition (P > 0.10). Daily feed intake averaged 7.1 kg/d across the three treatments and SID Lys intake averaged 74.6 g/d. Average SID His intake was 29.0, 38.0, and 44.9 g/d with increasing SID His:Lys ratio, exceeding NRC (2012) requirement estimates. These results suggest that a SID His:Lys ratio of 50% tended to increase calculated average daily milk yield and litter weight on day 7 and the day before weaning. Additional empirical requirement studies are warranted to reevaluate current NRC (2012) requirement estimates.

Indexed as

DietHistidineIleumLysineAnimal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBody WeightDietary SupplementsFemaleLactationLitter SizePregnancySwineHistidineLysinehistidinelactating sowlitter performancelysinemilk yield

Identifiers

PMID40888140
PMCPMC12448392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.