ArticleNeuro-oncology2025
Perfusion, diffusion, and anatomical MRI characteristics of pathologically confirmed malignant transformation in IDH-mutant gliomas.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated biomarker mapping reveals differential expression of senescence profiles in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma recurrent versus primary tumors.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Clinical and radiographic prognostic factors in recurrent contrast-enhancing IDH-mutant gliomas treated with bevacizumab.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study explored MRI characteristics at the time of tumor progression to study pathologically confirmed MT in IDHm 1p/19q-intact astrocytomas (IDHm-A) and IDHm 1p/19q-co-deleted oligodendrogliomas (IDHm-O).
methodsN = 64 patients with initial pathological grade 2 IDH-mutant glioma diagnosis who underwent repeated tissue sampling and were classified as pathologically confirmed MT (n = 35) or non-MT (n = 29) with available presurgical anatomical (n = 64), diffusion-weighted (n = 61), and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI (n = 53) were retrospectively studied. Measurable contrast enhancement (> 1000 mm3), tumor volume, tumor growth rate, sphericity, median apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and normalized relative cerebral blood volume (nrCBV) were compared between MT vs non-MT IDHm-A and IDHm-O.
results81% of contrast-enhancing IDHm-A and 100% of contrast-enhancing IDHm-O demonstrated MT, while 41% of IDHm-A and 62% IDHm-O exhibited both nonenhancing tumor progression and MT. Tumor volumes were significantly larger in patients with MT compared to non-MT groups for IDHm-A (P = .02) and IDHm-O (P = .04). T2/FLAIR tumor volume growth rate was significantly higher (P = .003), nrCBV was significantly higher (P = .002), and ADC trended lower (P = .06) in MT vs non-MT IDHm-A. There were no significant differences in growth rate, ADC, nrCBV, or sphericity when comparing MT vs non-MT IDHm-O (P > .05).
conclusionsMany MT IDHm gliomas remain nonenhancing. Growth rate, diffusion, and perfusion MRI show differences between MT and non-MT in IDHm-A but not IDHm-O, which may reflect the different tumor biology of these IDHm molecular subtypes and their need for separate imaging biomarkers. Tumor volumes can help determine MT for both IDHm-A and IDHm-O.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.