Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887987›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Single-view angiographic microcirculatory resistance index after primary PCI: the EARLY-MYO-AMR study.

Zhiwen Zhang, Song Ding, Quan Guo, Cao Ma, Fei Lin, Xiaoyu Rao, Qingbo Shi, Yang Gao, Kaiyuan Liu, Haosen Yu and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Angiography-Derived Physiology for Coronary Artery Disease Assessment: Expert Opinion From a SCAI Roundtable.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Angiographic-based assessment of microvascular dysfunction: quo vadis?EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Zhiwen ZhangDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Song DingDepartment of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Quan GuoDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Cao MaDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Fei LinDepartment of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Xiaoyu RaoMedicine Department, Xizang Minzu University, Xianyang, China.
Qingbo ShiDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yang GaoDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kaiyuan LiuDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Haosen YuDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ming NieDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Chao LiuDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Shengli LiDepartment of Cardiology, Shangqiu First People's Hospital, Shangqiu, China.
Yuting GaoDepartment of Cardiology, Yongcheng Central Hospital, Shangqiu, China.
Hongjie GaoDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Liang PengDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhenzhou ZhaoDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Kang ZhaoDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Haiyu TangDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ran YouDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Min ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Jun PuDepartment of Cardiology, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence, School of Cardiovascular Medicine & Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
Muwei LiDepartment of Coronary Heart Disease, Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Control & Prevention, Henan Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Central China Fuwai of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) leads to inadequate myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is an intraoperative diagnostic tool for CMD. However, its widespread application is hindered by the requirement for pressure wires and hyperaemic agents. The angiographic microcirculatory resistance (AMR) index is concise, convenient, accurate, and serves as a pressure wire-free alternative to the IMR.

aimsThis study aimed to demonstrate the ability of AMR to detect CMD in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI therapy and to assess its predictive value for long-term prognosis.

methodsThe EARLY-MYO-AMR trial comprised two cohorts. The derivation cohort included 495 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within 14 days of symptom onset. The optimal AMR cutoff value for diagnosing CMD using CMR was determined by analysing the receiver operating characteristic curves. The validation cohort enrolled 2,663 patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI within 12 h of symptom onset from January 2012 to April 2022 across 5 medical centres. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiac death, hospitalisation for heart failure, repeat myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularisation.

resultsThe derivation cohort identified an AMR cutoff >26.6 mmHg*s/dm for predicting CMD post-PPCI (area under the curve 0.721, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-0.763). Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm was a CMD risk factor (odds ratio 4.10, 95% CI: 2.56-6.56; p<0.001). The MACE incidence was significantly higher among patients in the validation cohort with AMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm than among those with AMR ≤26.6 mmHg*s/dm (30.9% vs 21.5%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% CI: 1.20-1.80; p<0.001). MACE incidence increased with AMR, with an adjusted HR of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.17-1.46; p<0.001) per 10 mmHg*s/dm increase. The Bland-Altman and Kappa analyses showed good intra- and interobserver agreement for AMR (intraobserver: bias=-0.104, k=0.914; interobserver: bias=-0.032, k=0.958).

conclusionsAMR >26.6 mmHg*s/dm predicts CMD during PPCI and increased MACE incidence in patients with STEMI. This convenient tool helps in risk stratification and treatment guidance for STEMI prognosis.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationMicrocirculationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionVascular ResistanceAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40887987
PMCPMC12378629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.