ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Who Tells the Story of the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia?-A Bibliometric Analysis From 2003 to 2023.
Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting Endogenous Wnt Antagonists for Therapy Development in AGA: a Focus on DKKs and sFRPs.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Who Tells the Story of the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia?-A Bibliometric Analysis From 2003 to 2023.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAndrogenetic alopecia (AGA) is a common form of nonscarring hair loss that affects both men and women, significantly influencing psychological well-being and quality of life. Although AGA accounts for over 90% of male hair loss, there has been limited bibliometric analysis to guide the direction of research and the development of treatments.
methodsA thorough literature search was performed using the Web of Science database, resulting in the identification of 2203 articles on AGA treatment published between 2003 and 2023. The search was restricted to English-language peer-reviewed publications. Bibliometric analysis was conducted to assess research trends, publication growth, and key contributors in AGA treatment research.
resultsThe United States and China emerged as the leading contributors, with major institutions such as the Mayo Clinic and Harvard Medical School making significant contributions. The research focus has shifted from traditional drug therapies to innovative treatments, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and anti-androgen therapy. Key research areas included anti-androgen treatments, PRP, and microneedling, whereas emerging trends pointed to stem cell therapy and gene therapy as future directions.
conclusionThe bibliometric analysis of AGA treatment research demonstrates an increasing interest in novel therapies and a transition towards more personalized and effective treatment approaches. These findings provide valuable insights into the development of AGA research and underscore areas in need of further exploration, offering a strategic guide for future research and clinical practice enhancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.