ArticleNMR in biomedicine2025
Differentiating Breast Tissue Stiffness With Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE): A Focus on Fibroglandular and Fatty Tissues.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnetic Resonance Elastography in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study on Optimal Imaging Frequency Selection and Differentiation of Molecular Subtypes.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Hydrogel-Coated Clips Are Associated with a Higher Risk of Dislocation After Ultrasound-Guided Breast Biopsy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Differentiating Breast Tissue Stiffness With Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE): A Focus on Fibroglandular and Fatty Tissues.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast density is a recognized risk factor for breast cancer and can affect the sensitivity of mammography. Consequently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended as a screening modality for women with increased breast density. However, mammography remains the primary method for assessing a woman's breast density classification. magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a new technique to evaluate tissue stiffness characteristics. This study aims to evaluate the ability of MRE to distinguish between fibroglandular and fatty tissues in normal women with different breast densities, potentially aiding in the classification of breast density using MRI. Forty-three women aged 40-79 years with normal screening mammograms were included in this prospective study. MRE was performed using a 1.5-T MRI scanner, and an in-house passive driver was used to obtain an MRE-capable gradient echo (GRE) sequence, which was integrated into a noncontrast-enhanced breast MRI protocol. MRE images were analyzed to measure stiffness values for fibroglandular and fatty tissue based on regions of interest (ROIs) in both breasts. Differences in mean stiffness between tissue types were assessed; a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant. Fibroglandular tissue exhibited significantly higher stiffness than fatty tissue in both breasts (right breast: 1.55 ± 0.31 kPa vs. 0.82 ± 0.13 kPa, p < 0.001; left breast: 1.46 ± 0.23 kPa vs. 0.81 ± 0.11 kPa, p < 0.001). Comparison between dense and nondense groups on mammograms revealed no significant difference in stiffness for the same tissue types in both breasts. MRE can potentially differentiate between fibroglandular and fatty breast tissues based on shear stiffness, independent of mammographic density. Future research with larger cohorts, including cancer cases, is needed to further establish MRE's role in breast cancer screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.