ArticleNeuro-oncology2026
DNA damage response profile distinguishes poor-acting gliomas with shared methylome signatures.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTherapies for diffuse glioma induce DNA damage response (DDR), and strategies to exploit DDR defects are active areas of investigation. While global DNA methylation profiling effectively classifies gliomas into subtypes, the epigenetic and gene expression patterns of DDR genes, and their contribution to tumor classification and outcomes, have yet to be fully elucidated. Thus, dissecting the DDR epigenetics, gene expression, and single-cell heterogeneity may reveal key molecular characteristics, refine prognosis, and identify novel treatment strategies and resistance mechanisms.
methodsWe characterized DDR epigenetics and gene expression of TCGA glioblastomas (GBM) and low-grade gliomas (LGG). Single-cell protein analysis by imaging mass cytometry (IMC) was performed on a separate cohort of 118 diffuse gliomas.
resultsAnalysis of TCGA cohorts revealed two DDR methylation groups that correlated with IDH mutation status and previously reported molecular groups. DDR transcription profiling further classified tumors into four groups. Those with high DDR transcription across pathways were linked to poor survival independent of IDH or MGMT status, and potentially improved prognostication beyond established biomarkers. Single-cell characterization of a separate cohort revealed intratumoral DDR diversity and identified proliferative tumor cells with high DDR protein expression across pathways that are associated with unfavorable grade and survival.
conclusionsTumor-level epigenetic and transcriptional DDR signatures alone can distinguish molecular-defined diagnosis and outcomes of gliomas beyond established biomarkers. A higher abundance of glioma cells with high DDR effector expression across pathways is associated with poor survival. Thus, clinical assessment of pan-DDR expression may inform prognosis and identify potential therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.