ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2025
Evaluation of an interactive educational intervention to improve nutritional practices for premature infants.
Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This pilot randomized trial study evaluated the effectiveness of the Pebbles of Hope Thrive Guide, an interactive educational course designed for parents of premature infants. The study assessed changes in breastfeeding practices, maternal nutrition, and use of Kangaroo Care among 50 mothers in total randomized to one of three groups: Supervised, Independent, or Control. The purpose of the study was to assess the provision of mother's breast milk, improved material nutrition behaviors, and adoption of Kangaroo Care among mothers that received access to the course compared to those that received standard education without Thrive Guide access. The primary outcome assessed was the provision of breast milk at three months post-intervention, while secondary outcomes included improvements in maternal confidence, changes in maternal nutrition behaviors, the adoption and frequency of providing Kangaroo Care, and the impact of educator supervision. Although the intervention improved mothers' confidence and knowledge, it did not significantly impact breast milk provision or maternal nutrition behaviors at 3 months. Breast milk provision declined across all groups, but the amount of decline was not statistically different between them. Similarly, no significant differences were observed in the number of nutritional improvements made between the two periods. However, Independent users exhibited a notable increase in Kangaroo Care frequency. Qualitative interviews highlighted the importance of ongoing support and addressing practical barriers to following nutritional guidelines. These findings suggest that further research is needed to explore the conditions that enhance long-term behavior change and to identify strategies that optimize the impact of educational interventions on caregiving practices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.