ArticleActa epileptologica2025
Long-term efficacy and predictors of vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Acta epileptologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic factors in vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy. Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Structural morphometry distinguishes vagus nerve stimulation outcomes in individuals with epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Vagus nerve stimulation: anti-inflammatory effects in epilepsy.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAt present, a number of indicators have been analyzed for the relationship with the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients, but there is still no definite predictor of efficacy. This study is to assess the long-term effectiveness and predictors of VNS in DRE patients.
methodsWe analyzed DRE patients monitored for over a year post-surgery (2016-2019) to evaluate VNS outcomes. Logistic regression was used to identify efficacy predictors.
resultsOut of 162 DRE patients with VNS, 99 were followed for over 12 months, 80 for over 24 months, and 70 for over 36 months. At 12 months, 33 (33.4%) showed effectiveness, including 7 (7.1%) who were seizure-free. At 24 months, 32 (40.0%) were effective, including 12 (15.0%) who were seizure-free. At 36 months, 36 (51.4%) were effective, including 11 (15.7%) who were seizure-free. After 5 years, 27 (55.1%) were effective, including 8 (16.3%) who were seizure-free. Multivariate regression analysis identified structural etiology as a predictive factor for the effective VNS treatment (P = 0.039, OR = 0.35 [0.13-0.95]).
conclusionsVNS effectively controls seizures, with effectiveness and seizure-free rates improving over time. Patients with structural factors are at higher risk of ineffective VNS, suggesting epilepsy etiology may predict VNS outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.