ArticleBMC chemistry2025
Multivariate classical least squares-based model for spectrophotometric determination of celecoxib and Tramadol in their new formulated dosage form.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Celecoxib (CLB) and tramadol (TRD) are frequently co-administered in clinical practice due to their complementary mechanisms in managing acute and chronic pain. Their combination has recently been formulated into a fixed-dose oral medication, representing the first FDA-approved multimodal analgesic targeting COX-2 and central opioid receptors simultaneously. However, the strong spectral overlap between CLB and TRD complicates their simultaneous determination using traditional spectrophotometric methods. In this study, a chemometric-assisted spectrophotometric method was developed for the simultaneous quantification of CLB and TRD without prior separation. The classical least squares (CLS) were ultimately selected due to its suitability when pure spectra are available, its robustness with small calibration sets, and its greater interpretability for routine quality control. A five-level, two-factor experimental design produced 25 binary mixtures, split into 13 calibration and 12 validation samples. After spectral preprocessing and removal of non-informative regions, the CLS model was applied to 81 variables across the 210-290 nm range. The model achieved mean recovery values of 99.85% for CLB and 99.99% for TRD in the calibration set, and 101.29% for CLB and 99.52% for TRD in the validation set, demonstrating excellent accuracy and consistency across both datasets. Linearity was established in the range of 6-14 µg/mL for both drugs, with detection limits of 0.55 µg/mL (CLB) and 0.67 µg/mL (TRD). The method showed excellent selectivity in the presence of common co-formulated drugs and was successfully applied to determine both analytes in commercial Seglentis
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.