ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Impact of tailored diabetes education on adherence and glycemic control in children and adolescents on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, prospective interventional study in a tertiary center.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Nurse-Led WIKAP Intervention on Hypoglycemia Coping Confidence and Outcomes in Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Zhijiang, China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Trial
- Factors Influencing Poor Drug Compliance Among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: An Experience from Rural Indonesia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- The use of the Roy Adaptation Model in clinical nursing care of an adolescent diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (case report).Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructured diabetes education plays a crucial role in the management of Type 1 Diabetes (T1D), especially with advanced technologies such as continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). This study evaluates the impact of tailored education on adherence and glycemic control among pediatric CSII users. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis interventional analytical study included 30 patients diagnosed with T1D with age ranged from 5 to 18 years, recruited from Diabetes & Endocrinology Clinic at tertiary university-based children's hospital. Patients were recruited for one year duration. Patients who were on multiple daily injection (MDI) for 2 to 10 years were shifted to CSII after receiving comprehensive diabetes education. Their education level was assessed individually using a questionnaire to assess patients' knowledge and application skills at the time of insulin pump insertion, 3 and 6 months later. Twenty-five patients were on mini-med 715, 10 patients used flash glucose monitoring, and 15 patients used self-monitoring blood sugar, while five patients were on mini-med 780G and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) using guardian 4 (G4).
resultsStudy included 19 females (63.3%) and 11 males (36.7%) with age ranged from 7 to 11 with mean ± SD of 10.74 ± 1.86. Patients' education level was assessed before pump insertion, and 3 months later which shows significant improvement in patients' diabetes knowledge and technical skills with P-value 0.038. Also, time in range (TIR) improved significantly in well-educated patients at 3 and 6 months with P-values 0.048 and 0.025 respectively. There was highly significant improvement of HbA1c after 6 months (8.82 ± 1.5 vs. 7.18 ± 0.56) with P-value 0.000 after receiving diabetes education.
conclusionsTailored diabetes education significantly improves adherence and glycemic outcomes in pediatric patients using CSII. Integrating structured educational programs with diabetes technology is essential to achieve optimal metabolic control in youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.