ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2025
Identification of stiff-knee gait in stroke survivors.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStiff-knee gait is a common movement disorder in individuals with stroke; however, standardized criteria for its identification remain lacking. This study aimed to examine suitable criteria for identifying stiff-knee stroke survivors to facilitate comparisons across studies. Twenty-four stroke survivors (45.2±13.7 years old) and 24 age- and sex-matched controls (45.5±13.5 years old) with no known gait impairment participated in this study. Participants walked along a 10-m walkway at a self-selected comfortable speed. A motion capture system recorded the trajectories of retroreflective markers placed on specific body landmarks. The following knee flexion parameters during gait cycle were analyzed: (1) peak knee flexion during the swing period, (2) total range of motion (RoM cycle), calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum knee excursion during gait cycle, (3) RoM from toe-off to peak knee flexion ("RoM swing"), and (4) timing of peak flexion. Comparisons were made among control, paretic, and non-paretic limbs.
resultsAmong the 21 stroke survivors identified with stiff-knee gait, the paretic limb showed reduced peak swing, RoM swing, and RoM cycle compared to both the control and non-paretic limbs, as well as earlier timing compared to the non-paretic limb only.
conclusionsAmong the four examined criteria to identify stiff-knee gait in stroke survivors, the most suitable are peak knee flexion during the swing period of less than 40°, and knee range of motion from toe-off to peak knee flexion of less than 12°.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.