ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2025
Comparative genomics of two closely related Acropora coral species with different spawning seasons reveals genomic regions possibly associated with gametogenesis.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine invertebrates release their gametes at an optimal time to produce the next generation. In reef-building scleractinian corals, synchronous spawning is essential for reproductive success. Molecular mechanisms of scleractinian gametogenesis have been studied; however, the mechanism by which coral gametes mature at specific times has yet to be discovered. The present study focused on two Acropora species with different spawning seasons. In Okinawa, Japan, Acropora digitifera spawns from May to June, whereas Acropora sp. 1 spawns in August. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that 60 genes are located in the diverged genomic regions between the two species, suggesting a possible association with timing of gametogenesis. Among candidate genes, we identified an Acropora sp. 1-specific amino acid change in gene WDR59, one of the components of a mTORC1 activator, GATOR2. Since regulation of gametogenesis by mTORC1 is widely conserved among eukaryotes, the difference in timing of gamete maturation observed in the two Acropora species may be caused by a substitution in WDR59 that slightly affects timing of mTORC1 activation via GATOR2. In addition, this substitution may lead to reproductive isolation between the two species, due to different spawning periods. Thus, we propose that A. digitifera and Acropora sp. 1 species pair is an effective model for studying coral speciation and understanding the molecular mechanisms that control coral spawning timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.