Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887591›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025

Efflux pumps positively contribute to rifampin resistance in rpoB mutant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Fanrong Meng, Yuanjin Chen, Zeyou Wei, Zhihui Liu, Xiaomin Lai, Jie Lei, Ling Wu, Li Deng, Qi Wang, Yu Yang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. CRISPRi-mediated silencing of the ABC transporterFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. HflX mediates rifampicin resistance inFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fanrong Meng *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yuanjin Chen *State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zeyou WeiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhihui LiuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaomin LaiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jie LeiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Ling WuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Li DengState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qi WangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yu YangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hua LiState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Bei XieState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Lan GongState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qun NiuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Junwen GaoState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Nan WangState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Institute of Pulmonary Diseases, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. wangnanzhj@126.com.
Jinxing HuState Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis Research, Department of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Institute of Tuberculosis, Guangzhou Medical University, 62 Hengzhigang Rd, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510095, People's Republic of China. hujinxing@gzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine Scientific Research Project 20231251Guangdong Medical Science and Technology Research Fund Project A2023284Guangdong Natural Science Foundation Project 2018A030313550Guangdong Natural Science Foundation Project 2023A1515010461Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project 20231A011051Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project 20241A011049Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 202002030152Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 202201010697Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project 2023A03J0992National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFC2304800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile several recent studies have documented the importance of efflux pumps as mediators of rifampin (RIF) resistance, it remains uncertain which efflux pumps play major roles in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains harboring rpoB gene mutations.

methodsIn this study, minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for RIF were calculated and the expression of 13 efflux pump genes was evaluated across 35 clinical rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates carrying the rpoB mutation before and after efflux pump inhibitor treatment.

resultsRv0677c and Rv0191 were identified as the efflux pump genes that were most frequently overexpressed, and treatment with the inhibitor verapamil was sufficient to synergistically enhance the antibacterial effects of RIF and downregulate efflux pump gene expression. Greater numbers of overexpressed efflux pump genes were associated with a more significant decrease in the MIC value for RIF following verapamil treatment. Levels of RIF resistance for clinical isolates with the rpoB codon 445 mutation were also found to be significantly less susceptible to the effects of verapamil as compared to the resistance of strains with the codon 450 and 170 mutations.

conclusionsThese results suggest that levels of RIF resistance in clinical RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates are ultimately determined by a combination of efflux pump activity and rpoB gene mutations.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesDrug Resistance, BacterialMembrane Transport ProteinsMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampinHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationVerapamilAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesMembrane Transport ProteinsRifampinrpoB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisVerapamilEfflux pumpEfflux pump inhibitorMycobacterium tuberculosisRifampicin resistance

Identifiers

PMID40887591
PMCPMC12400691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.