ArticleBMC oral health2025
Toward artificial intelligence in dental prosthesis planning - a preliminary in-silico feasibility study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental prosthesis planning is a multi-faceted and nuanced process of conceiving individual treatment plans based on dental findings and in line with established treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess whether an artificial neural network (ANN) provided with sufficient training data could approximate this process.
methodsDental prosthesis planning was abstracted as a mapping from dental findings to choices of dental prosthesis. The problem was framed as a multi-output multi-class classification. An ANN was trained via supervised learning to approximate dental prosthesis planning based on synthetic datasets of dental findings and corresponding prosthesis choices. The accuracy on unseen test data was examined as a function of the ANN's random initializations, the training set sizes, and the ANN architecture.
resultsWithin the scope and limitations of this study, the ANN achieved an accuracy of 99.51% (± 0.15).
conclusionsThe ability of ANNs to learn dental prosthesis planning was confirmed within the limitations of this preliminary in-silico study. The findings of this study corroborate that ANNs have the potential to support clinicians by providing automated recommendations for choices of dental prosthesis consistent with relevant rules, ultimately supporting and enhancing clinicians' decision making. Moreover, such ANNs may, in principle, enable advanced patient self-assessment of treatment needs and improve patient care in prosthodontics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.