Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40887569›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Peritoneal Lavage Cytology Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis and is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage II-III Colorectal Cancer.

Dewei Kong, Yingjie Li, Shenyi Yin, Yunfei Tan, Boyang Qu, Lei Huang, Jianzhong Jeff Xi, Aiwen Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07478107 (Application of the One-step Nucleic Acid Amplification), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07478107 completednot on this map

Application of the One-step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) Assay to Detect Free Cancer Cells in the Peritoneal Washing of Gastric and Colon Cancer Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliRan2024 to 2026Enrolled108ConditionsPeritoneal Carcinomatosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dewei Kong *State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Yingjie Li *State Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Shenyi YinState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yunfei TanState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Boyang QuState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Lei HuangState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Jianzhong Jeff XiState Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Future Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Aiwen WuState Key Laboratory of Holistic Integrative Management of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Beijing Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research, Unit III (Colorectal & Ostomy Service), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China. wuaw@sina.com.

Funding

Beijing Hospitals Authority's Ascent Plan DFL20241105Beijing Natural Science Foundation's Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Project 22JCZXJC00140National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal lavage cytology (PLC) is used to detect peritoneal micrometastases in gastrointestinal malignancies, but its prognostic value in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial, particularly in stage II-III. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of PLC in predicting postoperative outcomes and peritoneal metastasis risk among patients with stage II-III CRC, thereby facilitating individualized treatment strategies. PATIENTS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 375 patients with stage II-III CRC who underwent curative resection with standardized intraoperative PLC between January 2017 and August 2018. Survival outcomes, including 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. A prognostic nomogram incorporating PLC status along with other clinicopathological factors was developed and validated using area under the curve (AUC), C-index, and calibration curves. A competing risk analysis was performed to further elucidate the association between PLC positivity and specific metastasis patterns.

resultsPLC positivity, observed in 9.9% of patients, predicted reduced 5-year DFS and CSS, particularly in stage II patients, but not in stage III patients. Multivariate analysis identified PLC positivity as an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.11-4.95, P = 0.025), along with preoperative CA199, tumor location, lymphovascular invasion, and N stage. The prognostic model demonstrated excellent discrimination (C-index = 0.796) and calibration. In addition, PLC-positive patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of peritoneal metastasis.

conclusionsPLC is a valuable prognostic tool for the early detection of micrometastatic risk and peritoneal dissemination in stage II-III CRC, particularly in stage II disease.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsCytodiagnosisPeritoneal LavagePeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNomogramsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.