ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
Dermatological impacts of urological cancer treatments.
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urological cancers-including prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular cancers-are commonly treated with surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. While these therapies improve survival outcomes, they often induce significant dermatological side effects that impair patients' quality of life and treatment adherence. This review synthesizes current literature on the prevalence, mechanisms, and psychosocial consequences of dermatological toxicities associated with urological cancer treatments. Common adverse effects include dermatitis, alopecia, photosensitivity, hyperpigmentation, and scarring, with severity varying by treatment modality. Chemotherapy frequently causes alopecia and hand-foot syndrome, while radiation therapy leads to dermatitis and long-term fibrosis. Immunotherapy, though revolutionary, is associated with pruritus, vitiligo, and severe cutaneous reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The psychosocial burden of these dermatological effects-particularly impacts on body image and self-esteem-is substantial yet understudied. Multidisciplinary management strategies, including early dermatological intervention, patient education, and psychosocial support, are essential to mitigate these effects. Future research should focus on standardized protocols, personalized treatment approaches, and improved patient-reported outcome measures to optimize holistic cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40887555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.