SynthesisNeurosurgical review2025
The efficacy of machine learning algorithms in evaluating factors associated with shunt-dependent hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification of factors associated with chronic shunt-dependent hydrocephalus (CSDH) following spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains challenging, despite numerous studies. Early recognition of patients at higher risk for requiring shunt placement is important for optimizing management strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of machine learning (ML) algorithms in analyzing datasets related to CSDH post-SAH, assessing performance metrics such as sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity. A systematic review was conducted across five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science) to identify studies employing ML to analyze factors associated with CSDH following SAH. Data extraction included ML techniques, input features, and performance metrics such as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score. Two independent reviewers extracted and organized the data, including details on machine learning models, validation processes, and metrics. Out of 993 reviewed studies, five met the inclusion criteria for analyzing ML models in relation to CSDH post-SAH. The pooled AUC-ROC across these models was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78-0.81), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 42.58%, Q (19) = 34.79, p = 0.01). No significant differences in AUC-ROC were observed between linear, tree-based, and deep learning models (Q (2) = 0.99, p = 0.61). Studies utilizing fewer than 10 input features showed a lower pooled AUC-ROC of 0.78, whereas those with more than 10 features achieved a higher AUC-ROC of 0.82, with heterogeneity of 7.52% and 66.53%, respectively. Machine learning algorithms can assist in identifying factors associated with the development of chronic hydrocephalus following spontaneous SAH through analysis of clinical datasets. Incorporating a greater number of relevant risk factors may further improve the performance of these ML models in understanding high-risk patient profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40887550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.