ArticleExperimental brain research2025
Cognitive representations of multilevel buildings: two- or three-dimensional?
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consolidation of cognitive maps as a gradual process.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research suggests that conventional multilevel buildings are cognitively represented as a stack of horizontal planes, whereas an atrium-shaped architecture which allows easy visual access to other levels is represented as a volume. The present study investigated whether easy physical access to other levels also promotes a volumetric representation. Participants were examined in a virtual 3D grid maze in which they could access higher and lower levels at each intersection. During a learning phase, they were transported through the maze across twelve intersection, each featuring a unique object. In the subsequent test phase, they were asked to indicate the location of these objects on a schematic drawing of the maze. Response accuracy in the test phase was similar when the twelve visited objects were arranged in a horizontal plane and when they were laid out in a volume. In accordance with earlier reasoning, this suggests that easy physical access to other levels indeed can facilitate a volumetric cognitive representation of multilevel architectures. Additional findings suggest that this representation emerged gradually rather than abruptly like a sudden insight, and that transport through the maze without left and right turns facilitated the internal representation, probably by reducing the associated cognitive load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40887528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.